Paradigm Shifted

be the change you wish to see in the world

an ode to coffee (why mass consumerism will ruin us all)

Posted by deepali on January 24, 2008

Starbucks has recently tested $1 coffee and free refills, in an effort to be more competitive with Dunkin Donuts and McDonalds. One dollar coffee. Does anyone else realize how absurdly cheap that is? I think, in our fast food nation, we’ve forgotten about the true cost of things.

When McDonalds turned beef into a commodity we could afford to eat every day (sometimes multiple times a day), it sent us hurtling down the road of cheap consumer goods (and global warming and obesity, but that’s a different post). Now, we’ve forgotten what quality means, and how much it really costs. I don’t eat meat, but even I can tell that the $2 Whopper at BK is nothing compared to the $35 steak at Morton’s. Comparing the two is like apples and oranges, and yet the comparison is made all the time. It is one thing not to be able to afford the pricey steak, it’s another to even think that the whopper is any sort of valid substitute. And yet, that’s what we’ve been led to believe.

And now, mass consumerism has ruined my favorite vice - coffee. Let me disclaim - I don’t drink Starbucks coffee. I find it overroasted and burnt. But I do respect them as a company because they tend to lead the socially conscious pack. I had hoped, as the economy took a downturn, that Starbucks would take a different approach - one of enhancing customer loyalty (perhaps even some in-store brewing of their fair trade blends). Instead, they’ve fallen prey to mass consumerism and cheaply produced goods.

Let me be blunt - $3 for coffee is not a lot. We just think otherwise, because we get so much crap for cheap. But good quality coffee should be expensive. It should also not be slugged down mugsful at a time (much like meat was never meant to be eaten so often). In a fairly priced market, with fair wages, coffee would possibly cost more. It should cost more.

One day, I want to see labeling detailing the true cost of goods. I want to know how many children were forced to carry 50-kilo bags of coffee cherries to make that cup of McDs brew. I want to know how many acres of rainforest were cleared for that cheap bag of beans from Dunkin. I want to know how much energy it took to produce my Starbucks latte.

The problem isn’t $3 for a cup of coffee. The problem is the ridiculous mark-up and the cheap cost of labor (and the strain on the global environment). I would like to think that Starbucks is taking a loss on that $1/cup in order to sell more, but I know that won’t be the case. Instead, they’ll undercut the Ethiopian co-ops and buy ridiculously cheap beans from subsistence farmers in Indonesia, further perpetuating the cycle of poverty and deforestation.

So I’m going to stick to my single-origin, fair-trade, organic, shade-grown beans and continue to brew my own $3 cup at home. I’m willing to pay the full price for quality and sustainability.

11 Responses to “an ode to coffee (why mass consumerism will ruin us all)”

  1. herbal tea Says:

    I am in full agreement. People complain all the time about the quality of things and why things are so cheaply made etc. etc. etc… but you get what you pay for. Don’t expect incredible things at incredibly low prices…that is just not how things work. I think we all need to be a little more conscious, and not so naive, about what it takes for us to enjoy the luxuries in life…or maybe just not ignore the facts so much.

  2. RacerX Says:

    No offense, but it easier to be “Socially Conscience” when your product makes 80+ points :)

  3. Friday Roundup - The Robert Burns’ Edition « Remodeling This Life Says:

    [...] Love this article at Paradigm Shifted. Bring on the expensive coffee! [...]

  4. deepali Says:

    @ Herbal Tea - Right on.

    @ RacerX - in retrospect, seems like some excellent business planning on their part, yeah?

  5. SavingDiva Says:

    I also agree with Herbal Tea. The quality of products has really gone down hill…

  6. advice to a meat-eater from a vegetarian « Paradigm Shifted Says:

    [...] meat was a delicacy. The fast food industry changed that for us, and now meat is relatively cheap. But with that drop in price also came a drop in quality. Factory-farmed meat is, in a word, terrible. There is a considerable difference in taste and [...]

  7. mbhunter Says:

    I’m glad that I played a part in inspiring this post.

    I fall into the addict category; I DO slug down a pot of coffee a day. It’s really bad. But that’s beside the point.

    The $1 cup of Starbucks is likely just an attempt to maintain market share. I don’t see Starbucks as socially conscious at all. It’s a predatory company with a keen eye on the bottom line and its stock price, which has been taking a hit recently. It’s a smart business move and little else, IMHO.

  8. deepali Says:

    @ MBHunter - I agree it’s an attempt to maintain (and even gain) market share. That’s part of the reason why it annoys me. But Starbucks is more socially conscious than most - they were one of the first companies to offer ethically grown coffee (ie, fair trade, etc), they were also one of the first retailers to offer health insurance to all employees. They pay the highest price for beans in Latin America (even if they’re sucking Africa dry), and they invest a lot in local communities (perhaps in response to driving out local businesses). At the end of the day, I sleep easier at night having gone to Starbucks than I would if I’d gone to Burger King.
    Thanks for the comment!

  9. Fiction Scribe » Blog Archive » Soup to Nuts Blog Carnival - Dessert Says:

    [...] deepali of Paradigm Shifted doesn’t have a rosy outlook for the world or capitalization in an ode to coffee (why mass consumerism will ruin us all) [...]

  10. soup to nuts progressive dinner « Paradigm Shifted Says:

    [...] dessert @ Fiction Scribe, where you can read my post an ode to coffee (why mass consumerism will ruin us all) [...]

  11. steve Says:

    Starbucks as a company has probably done as much or more for the plight of coffee growers as the “Fair Trade” coffee movement. The situation for coffee growers far predates Starbucks and is similar to the situation for countries that produce bananas, etc, in which large (mostly American) coffee companies put coffee producers at a serious disadvantage throughout the 20th century, while at the same time gradually degrading the quality of their product (canned coffee)by gradually increasing the amount of cheap robusta beans compared to arabica beans, so that the end consumer didn’t notice it.

    Starbucks, although they don’t participate in Fair Trade, in many cases pays more than “Fair Trade” rates for their coffee. They have an interest in getting quality beans, so, while they aren’t **giving** money away, they have an interest in having and nurturing viable suppliers.

    Starbucks also has the primary responsibility for creating the gourmet coffee market in this country, which has created a market for smaller roasters/cafes that didn’t exist before Starbucks created it.

    And, yes, they are a big successful corporation and do some things that aren’t “nice” as well.

    If you want an interesting book about coffee and Starbucks, try reading “Starbucked”, which was published in 2008.

    –steve

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>